Lab Animals Essay

IELTS Animal Testing Essay

Here you will find an example of an IELTS animal testing essay.

In this essay, you are asked to discuss the arguments for and against animal testing, and then give your own conclusions on the issue.

This means you must look at both sides of the issue and you must also be sure you give your opinion too.

The essay is similar to an essay that says "Discuss both opinions and then give your opinion" but it is worded differently.

Take a look at the question and model answer below, and think about how the essay has been organised and how it achieves coherence and cohesion.

Animal Testing Essay

Animals Testing Essay - Model Answer

Issues related to animal experimentation are frequently discussed these days, particularly in the media. It is often said that animals should not be used in testing because it is cruel and unnecessary. This essay will examine the arguments for and against animal testing.

On the one hand, the people who support these experiments say that we must do tests on animals. For instance, many famous lifesaving drugs were invented in this way, and animal experiments may help us to find more cures in the future. Indeed, possibly even a cure for cancer and AIDS. Furthermore, the animals which are used are not usually wild but are bred especially for experiments. Therefore, they believe it is not true that animal experiments are responsible for reducing the number of wild animals on the planet.

On the other hand, others feel that there are good arguments against this. First and foremost, animal experiments are unkind and cause animals a lot of pain. In addition, they feel that many tests are not really important, and in fact animals are not only used to test new medicines but also new cosmetics, which could be tested on humans instead. Another issue is that sometimes an experiment on animals gives us the wrong result because animals’ bodies are not exactly the same as our own. As a consequence, this testing may not be providing the safety that its proponents claim.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion, on balance, that the benefits do not outweigh the disadvantages, and testing on animals should not continue. Although it may improve the lives of humans, it is not fair that animals should suffer in order to achieve this.

(Words 278)


This animal testing essay would achieve a high score.

It fully answers all parts of the task- explaining the arguments 'for' in the first paragraph and the arguments 'against' in the next. Conclusions are then drawn with the writer giving their opinion in the conclusion.

It is thus very clearly organised, with each body paragraph having a central idea.

Ideas are also extended and supported by the use of reasons and some examples or further clarification. No ideas are left unclear or unexplained.

There is also some good topic related vocabulary in the animal testing essay such as 'life saving drugs' and 'bred' and a mix of complex sentences, such as adverbial clauses:

'Although it may improve the lives of humans, it is not fair that animals should suffer in order to achieve this'.

Noun clauses:

'...they feel that many tests are not really important'.

And relative clauses:

'...the animals which are used are not usually wild...'

Transitions are also used effectively to ensure there is good coherence and cohesion. For example, 'On the other hand..' indicates a change to discuss the contrasting ideas, and 'Therefore..." and 'As a consequence..' are used to give results.


You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Examine the arguments in favour of and against animal experiments, and come to a conclusion on this issue.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Write at least 250 words.

1. Badyal DK, Bala S, Kathuria P. Student evaluation of teaching and assessment methods in pharmacology. Indian J Pharmacol. 2010;42:86–8.[PMC free article][PubMed]

2. Babu CS, Latha K, Thirunavukkarasu J, Tharani CB. Virtual experimental pharmacology an alternative or not? A global assessment by pharmacology faculties and MBBS students? Rec Res Sci Tech. 2011;3:25–9.

3. Badyal DK, Modgill V, Kaur J. Computer simulation models are implementable as replacements for animal experiments. Altern Lab Anim. 2009;37:191–5.[PubMed]

4. Dewhurst DG, Kojic ZZ. Replacing animal use in physiology and pharmacology teaching in selected universities in eastern Europe-charting a way forward. Altern Lab Anim. 2011;39:15–22.[PubMed]

5. Committee for the purpose of control and supervision of experiments on animals (CPCSEA) [Last accessed on 2013 May 25]. Available from: .

6. University Grants Commission; 2011. [Last accessed on 2013 May 25]. Guidelines for discontinuation of dissection and animal experimentation in zoology/life sciences in a phased manner. Available from: .

7. Medical council of India, New Delhi, amendment notification of 8 July 2009 to the Minimal standard requirements for medical colleges with 150 admissions annually, regulations. 1999. [Last accessed on 2013 May 25]. Available from: .

8. Bertoloni MD. Early modern experimentation on live animals. J Hist Biol. 2013;46:199–226.[PubMed]

9. Animal testing. Wikipedia. [Last accessed on 2013 May 25]. Available from: .

10. Nuffield council of bioethics. [Last accessed on 2013 May 25]. Available from: .

11. Annual report animal usage by fiscal year, United States department of agriculture, animal and plant inspection service. 2011. [Last accessed on 2013 May 25]. Available from: .

12. Statistics of scientific procedures on living animals. Home office, Great Britain. 2012. [Last accessed on 2013 May 25]. Available from: .

13. Liebsch M, Grune B, Seiler A, Butzke D, Oelgeschla¨ger M, Pirow R, et al. Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives. Arch Toxicol. 2011;85:841–58.[PMC free article][PubMed]

14. IUCN the red list of threatened species. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

15. The recommendations of the sub-committee on rehabilitation of animals after experimentation set up by CPCSEA. 2006. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

16. Mohammad AA, Mohammed Z, Karukayil JM. Alternatives to animals in education, research and risk assessment: An overview with special reference to Indian context. ALTEX. 2013;2:5–19.

17. Dewhurst D, Hemmi A. A survey of animal use and alternatives in higher education in Europe. University of Edinburgh, UK. ALTEX. 2012;1:1–14.

18. Animals in scientific procedures, UK Parliament/Chapter 1: Introduction. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

19. All noble prizes in physiology or medicine. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

20. Balcombe J. 1st ed. Washington: Humane Society Press; 2000. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. The use of animals in higher education: Problems, alternatives and recommendations. Available from: .

21. Regulations on graduate medical education, 1997 (amended upto 2010). Medical Council of India. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

22. Badyal D. 1st ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Publishers; 2008. Practical manual of Pharmacology; pp. 73–93.

23. Postgraduate medical education regulations, 2000 (amended upto 2012). Medical Council of India. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

24. Arora T, Mehta AK, Joshi V, Mehta KD, Rathor N, Mediratta PK, et al. Substitute of animals in drug research: an approach towards fulfillment of 4R's. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2011;73:1–6.[PMC free article][PubMed]

25. Vandebriel RJ, van Loveren H. Non-animal sensitization testing: State-of-the-art. Cri Rev Toxicol. 2010;40:389–404.[PubMed]

26. Pound P, Ebrahim S, Sandercock P, Bracken MB, Roberts I. Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans? BMJ. 2004;328:514–7.[PMC free article][PubMed]

27. Cosmetics and animal testing: A historic victory. Peta UK. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

28. More than a cosmetic change. News feature. Nature. 2012;438:144–6.[PubMed]

29. Creton S, Dewhurst IC, Earl LK, Gehen SC, Guest RL, Hotchkiss JA, et al. Acute toxicity testing of chemicals: Opportunities to avoid redundant testing and use alternative approaches. Cri Rev Toxicol. 2010;40:50–83.[PubMed]

30. Wilson-Sanders SE. Models for biomedical research, testing and education. ILAR J. 2011;52:126–52.[PubMed]

31. Animal testing is bad science. Point/counterpoint. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

32. Mardas D, Mohammad AA, Bas B, Francesca C, Pierre C, Rodger C, et al. A framework program for the teaching of alternative methods (replacement, reduction, refinement) to animal experimentation. Altex. 20;28:341–52.[PubMed]

33. Liu Z, Liu J, Wang F, Xu G, Hou J, Wan X, et al. Improvement of local lymph node assay for cosmetics safety evaluation [Article in Chinese] Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2009;38:585–9.[PubMed]

34. Richmond J. Refinement, reduction, and replacement of animal use for regulatory testing: future improvements and implementation within the regulatory framework. ILAR J. 2002;43:S63–8.[PubMed]

35. Kurosawa TM. Alternatives to animal experimentation v.s. animal school [Article in Chinese] Yakugaku Zasshi. 2008;128:741–6.[PubMed]

36. Report on Enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act. U.S. Department of Agriculture. [Last accessed 2013 May 30]. Available from: 2005 Report on Enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act” (PDF)

37. Smith JA, Jennings M. Categorising the severity of scientific procedures on animals. The Boyd Group and the RSPCA, July 2004 RSPCA. Research Animals Department

38. People for the ethical treatment of animals. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

39. BBC news; [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Two drug trial men critically ill. Available from: .

40. Animal rights [Wikipedia] [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: Animal rights .

41. A chronology of animal protection laws. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

42. The prevention of cruelty to animals act, as amended by Central Act 26 of 1982. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

43. Ministry of social justice and empowerment notification, New Delhi, 1998. The Breeding of and Experiments on Animals (Control and Supervision) Rules. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

44. Guidelines for care and use of animals in scientific research. Indian National science academy. First edition, revised edition. 1992, 2000. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

45. Guidelines for use of laboratory animals in medical colleges. Indian council of medical research, New Delhi. 2001. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

46. Vision 2015, Medical Council of India. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

47. Guhad F. Introduction to the 3 Rs (refinement, reduction and replacement) Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2005;4:58–9.[PubMed]

48. Validation, regulatory acceptance and international harmonization. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

49. Balls M, Amcoff P, Bremer S, Casati S, Coecke S, Clothier R, et al. The principles of weight of evidence validation of test methods and test strategies. Altern Lab Anim. 2005;34:603–20.[PMC free article][PubMed]

50. Wind M, Blakey D, Kojima H, Kreysa J, Stokes W. The international cooperation on alternative test methods (ICATM) ALTEX. 2010;27(Spec Issue):207–10.

51. Table of validated and accepted alternative methods (updated 2013) [Last accessed 2013 on May 30]. Available from: .

52. Takahashi K, Ishikawa N, Sadamoto Y, Sasamoto H, Ohta S, Shiozawa A, et al. E-Cell 2: Multi-platform E-Cell simulation system. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1727–9.[PubMed]

53. Ispra, Italy: European centre for the validation of alternative test methods (ECVAM); 2006. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Statement on the scientific validity of the in vitro micronucleus assay as an alternative to the in vitro chromosomal aberration assay for genotoxicity testing. Available from: .

54. Teaching and learning resources, IndPharnet. Network of Indian pharmacologists. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: .

55. CD on X-Cology Pharmacy. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: Http:// .

56. Simulated animal experiments in pharmacology. ExPharm pro. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: Http:// .

57. PETA sponsors emantras’ virtual frog dissection software for schools and colleges. 2012. [Last accessed on 2013 May 30]. Available from: Http:// .

58. Stewart AM, Kalueff AV. The Developing utility of zebrafish models for cognitive enhancers. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2012;10:263–71.[PMC free article][PubMed]

59. Mahmood F, Mozere M, Zdebik AA, Stanescu HC, Tobin J, Beales PL, et al. Generation and validation of a zebrafish model of EAST (epilepsy, ataxia, sensorineural deafness and tubulopathy) syndrome. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6:652–60.[PMC free article][PubMed]

60. Segner H, Caroll K, Fenske M, Janssen CR, Maack G, Pascoe D, et al. Identification of endocrine disrupting effects in aquatic vertebrates and in vertebrates: Report from Europen IDEA project. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2003;54:302–14.[PubMed]

61. Dikshit RK. Animal experiments: Confusion, contradiction, and controversy. Indian J Pharmacol. 2012;44:661–2.[PMC free article][PubMed]

0 Replies to “Lab Animals Essay”

Lascia un Commento

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *